News:

           Enjoy your FJ


Main Menu

pod filters and carb jetting

Started by Rampant_ant, April 25, 2011, 01:35:42 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

andyb

I've noticed the opposite effect.  Advanced static timing gives easier starting and a pinch more low  rpm power, retarded timing gives a power cut at the bottom (making a more noticable kick up high, sometimes past redline so you'll just lose overall), and the lack of immediate torque makes it harder to start.

YMMV, I suspect!  If you just grind the stock plate a pinch, you'll have the option to return it back to stock as desired, with only time being your loss.


Flying Scotsman

I plan on adding a few deg timing what way do you shift the plate cw or ccw.I plan on checking the valves too and adding slotted cam gears.
1984 FJ1100
1985 FJ1100
1990 FJ1200
1999 GP1200 (165 + hp)

Flynt

Quote from: Flying Scotsman on May 15, 2011, 10:48:25 AM
I plan on adding a few deg timing what way do you shift the plate cw or ccw.I plan on checking the valves too and adding slotted cam gears.


I did this per RPM Randy's suggestion.  CW and grind the holes out to the edge of the mark left by the screw head...  i.e. grind the holes on the left side as you're looking at the timing plate installed.

Frank
There's plenty of time for sleep in the grave...

Flying Scotsman

Thank you saved me the trouble of figuring it out.Its on the list of things to do.
1984 FJ1100
1985 FJ1100
1990 FJ1200
1999 GP1200 (165 + hp)

Alf

Quote from: andyb on May 15, 2011, 10:23:02 AM
I've noticed the opposite effect.  Advanced static timing gives easier starting and a pinch more low  rpm power, retarded timing gives a power cut at the bottom (making a more noticable kick up high, sometimes past redline so you'll just lose overall), and the lack of immediate torque makes it harder to start.

YMMV, I suspect!  If you just grind the stock plate a pinch, you'll have the option to return it back to stock as desired, with only time being your loss.



The effect of having an ignition advancer fitted is similar to high compression pistons: with the advancer the spark ignites the combustion chamber a fraction of time before the piston is at TLC, so with the extra gases of the combustion there is more pressure at the chamber = more compression is obtained at this moment

ribbert

Quote from: Alf on May 16, 2011, 03:52:39 AM
Quote from: andyb on May 15, 2011, 10:23:02 AM
I've noticed the opposite effect.  Advanced static timing gives easier starting and a pinch more low  rpm power, retarded timing gives a power cut at the bottom (making a more noticeable kick up high, sometimes past redline so you'll just lose overall), and the lack of immediate torque makes it harder to start.

YMMV, I suspect!  If you just grind the stock plate a pinch, you'll have the option to return it back to stock as desired, with only time being your loss.



The effect of having an ignition advance fitted is similar to high compression pistons: with the advancer the spark ignites the combustion chamber a fraction of time before the piston is at TLC, so with the extra gases of the combustion there is more pressure at the chamber = more compression is obtained at this moment
Quote from: Alf on May 16, 2011, 03:52:39 AM
Quote from: andyb on May 15, 2011, 10:23:02 AM
I've noticed the opposite effect.  Advanced static timing gives easier starting and a pinch more low  rpm power, retarded timing gives a power cut at the bottom (making a more noticable kick up high, sometimes past redline so you'll just lose overall), and the lack of immediate torque makes it harder to start.

YMMV, I suspect!  If you just grind the stock plate a pinch, you'll have the option to return it back to stock as desired, with only time being your loss.



The effect of having an ignition advancer fitted is similar to high compression pistons: with the advancer the spark ignites the combustion chamber a fraction of time before the piston is at TLC, so with the extra gases of the combustion there is more pressure at the chamber = more compression is obtained at this moment





"Tell a wise man something he doesn't know and he'll thank you, tell a fool something he doesn't know and he'll abuse you"

ribbert

Quote from: Alf on May 16, 2011, 03:52:39 AM
Quote from: andyb on May 15, 2011, 10:23:02 AM
I've noticed the opposite effect.  Advanced static timing gives easier starting and a pinch more low  rpm power, retarded timing gives a power cut at the bottom (making a more noticable kick up high, sometimes past redline so you'll just lose overall), and the lack of immediate torque makes it harder to start.

YMMV, I suspect!  If you just grind the stock plate a pinch, you'll have the option to return it back to stock as desired, with only time being your loss.



The effect of having an ignition advancer fitted is similar to high compression pistons: with the advancer the spark ignites the combustion chamber a fraction of time before the piston is at TLC, so with the extra gases of the combustion there is more pressure at the chamber = more compression is obtained at this moment

Anyone familiar with old cars and bikes fitted with manual advance/retard levers will recall the standard starting procedure is full retard until it fires then advance a little then advance more once under way or under load (pre mechanical/ vacuum advance).  This is now taken care of automatically on modern engines, the "mechanical" advances with revs, the "vacuum" with load. This curve is predetermined by the manufacturer but in most cases the starting point is adjustable. This, and the curve, were often compromised (particularly in the 70's & 80's) to achieve emissions results. While trial and error(advance) may show some improvement over standard, results can be deceptive.  The perceived increase in power or torque may only be relative to a loss of it somewhere else. Retarded engines (within reason) start easily, definitely run hotter and offer no real performance improvement anywhere above idle. These are general observations not specifically Fj.


"Tell a wise man something he doesn't know and he'll thank you, tell a fool something he doesn't know and he'll abuse you"

ribbert

Aaaaargh, the first line and a half of the previous post are not mine but part of what I was responding to.  Mine starts with "Anyone familiar with old cars........................"

Noel
"Tell a wise man something he doesn't know and he'll thank you, tell a fool something he doesn't know and he'll abuse you"

Marsh White

Quote from: ribbert on May 16, 2011, 06:44:02 AM
Aaaaargh, the first line and a half of the previous post are not mine but part of what I was responding to.  Mine starts with "Anyone familiar with old cars........................"

Noel

FYI: you could have just gone back and edited your original post.  You have 30 minutes to make edits.

andyb

Quote from: Alf on May 16, 2011, 03:52:39 AM
The effect of having an ignition advancer fitted is similar to high compression pistons: with the advancer the spark ignites the combustion chamber a fraction of time before the piston is at TLC, so with the extra gases of the combustion there is more pressure at the chamber = more compression is obtained at this moment

I agree, but remember to compare fairly modern and relatively efficent, high rpm engines, rather than old technology, low reving engines with less efficent combustion chambers, as well as considering piston area and how that relates to burn time.  The overall goal is to put the peak combustion pressure right where the engine has the best leverage on the rod.  You can read about some of Larry Widmer's (sp?) work, he did a bunch with altering swirl to change how the burn rates changed. 

Lotsokids

O.K. - One last shot here. How does 125 Main jets and 42.5 Pilot jets sound?  :unknown:

Once again, I'm running Vance & Hines SS2R exhaust with pod air filters and no timing advance. I'll be ordering soon.
U.S. Air Force sport bike instructor (initial cadre), 2007-2009

I'm an American living & working in Hungary

Pat Conlon

Quote from: Lotsokids on May 19, 2011, 11:25:30 AM
O.K. - One last shot here. How does 125 Main jets and 42.5 Pilot jets sound?
Once again, I'm running Vance & Hines SS2R exhaust with pod air filters and no timing advance. I'll be ordering soon.

Sure, Go for it.
I've got 42.5 pilots on my '84, screws @ 2.5 turns.....In the mountains at 6k msl slow speed putting around town, I'm rich, 40.0's would be better, however at sea level in Palm Desert, on a hot summer day my bike is happy happy happy.....
1) Free Owners Manual download: https://tinyurl.com/fmsz7hk9
2) Don't store your FJ with E10 fuel https://tinyurl.com/3cjrfct5
3) Replace your old stock rubber brake lines.
4) Important items for the '84-87 FJ's:
Safety wire: https://tinyurl.com/99zp8ufh
Fuel line: https://tinyurl.com/bdff9bf3

andyb

Sounds close.  I'd consider 122's if you tend to ride more in the heat and/or if you are at >1000' altitude, otherwise the 125's will be a pinch fat on hot days.  They'll work fine though, especially when it gets cold.

Lotsokids

Quote from: Pat Conlon on May 19, 2011, 12:12:34 PM
Sure, Go for it.
I've got 42.5 pilots on my '84, screws @ 2.5 turns.....In the mountains at 6k msl slow speed putting around town, I'm rich, 40.0's would be better, however at sea level in Palm Desert, on a hot summer day my bike is happy happy happy.....

Since I have the illusive '88 / European model, aren't my stock pilot jets 40's? If so, I don't mind leaving them alone. I might also run 122's on the mains.

Sorry if I seem to be beating this to death. It's very difficult for me to get aftermarket parts. I have to order them and send them to the U.S., then get them when I take a trip back to the U.S. - the Hungarian mail system is broken. It's not like I can just go down to the motorcycle shop and get a different size jet. I need to get this right the first time.

Thanks for the input! :good2:
U.S. Air Force sport bike instructor (initial cadre), 2007-2009

I'm an American living & working in Hungary

andyb

In that case, get a couple sets :)  They're not terribly pricy.  A set of 125's and 120's, some shim washers for the needles, and a set of 42 pilots should cover a pretty wide variety of bases.