News:

This forum is run by RPM and donations from members.

It is the donations of the members that help offset the operating cost of the forum. The secondary benefit of being a contributing member is the ability to save big during RPM Holiday sales. For more information please check out this link: Membership has its privileges 

Thank you for your support of the all mighty FJ.

Main Menu

FJ-09 question and a v65 question

Started by gumby302ho, September 29, 2020, 07:28:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

gumby302ho

 Okay, is there any real difference between the FJ-09 and the Tracer? And I have always wondered was the V65 Magna faster in all aspects then the V65 Sabre? When the V65 came out it took many folks by surprise out of the hole. I also remember the kawasaki 900 Eliminator, little stretched out with a very heavy clutch and fat rear tire made for just launching off the line. Yadda yadda...

fj1289

Uh...I'm thinking there's a LOT of difference

FJ-09









Tracer





:pardon:

FJ_Hooligan

They dropped the FJ and are now calling it Tracer to be consistent with the rest of the world.  Same bike.

I believe the V65 Magna and Sabre used the same motor so no difference between them performance-wise, only riding position

The V65 was a torque monster and very fun to ride.  A friend of mine had a Magna in 1985.  It would jump me off the line and in slower speed roll-ons, but once the revs got up the FJ would blow by it.
DavidR.

gumby302ho

Quote from: FJ_Hooligan on September 30, 2020, 05:09:52 PM
They dropped the FJ and are now calling it Tracer to be consistent with the rest of the world.  Same bike.

I believe the V65 Magna and Sabre used the same motor so no difference between them performance-wise, only riding position

The V65 was a torque monster and very fun to ride.  A friend of mine had a Magna in 1985.  It would jump me off the line and in slower speed roll-ons, but once the revs got up the FJ would blow by it.

   Yes that is and was so true, the V65 was just another reason why the mighty FJ rocked!!! when I was a late teen all the FJ"s were setup for drags and not on tour! V-Max was another big yam surprise. The eighties were cool in my world.

giantkiller

 :lol: still laughing about the  picture comparison.

On to something else that used to  make me laugh.  My  buddy had a  v65 sabre. When he would  gas it hard and  back off  right away. it would quite literally jump off the ground. The whole thing would lift up because the  shaft drive would  torque the back wheel down so hard. The front wheel would come up. And when he chopped the throttle right away the back tire would come up off the ground.   :rofl:
86 fj1350r
86 fj1380t turbo drag toy (soon)
87 fj1200 865 miles crashed for parts
89 fj1200 touring 2up
87 fzr1000 crashed
87 fzr750r Human Race teams world endurance champion
93 fzr600 Vance n hines ltd for sale
Custom chopper I built
Mini chopper I built for my daughter just like the big 1

fj1289

I traded my first car for a new old-stock 1982 Yamaha 650 Seca in 1985.  The shaft drive on it was similar - the back end would rise instead of squat when you got on it good.  My buddies that it was crazy - don't think I ever got it to hop like that though.  



Oh yeah - back to the original topic — Tracer?  Yamaha is calling it the Tracer?  WTF!?  Why do they think they need to give it a name?  What's wrong with FJ-09?  Well, at least they didn't call it lard-ass or any other Harley sounding name.   But why something as lame as Tracer?  It was a crappy name deserving of a crappy econobox car - not something that a bike as good as that one seems to be should be saddled with. 

Millietant

They're just following the global marketing route like mist everyone else.......and like all things, it goes in cycles.

Remember when Kawasaki had the Samurai, Suzuki the Hustler, Honda the Dream.......then we had the Seca series, the Katana's, the Ninja's, the Fieblades.......and the Hayabusa, the Panigale's, the Super Duke's et al.......

And every so often, they go back to using just numbers......it's all about following or driving the market to get a "sales adrvantage" or build a "brand identity".

It's the price we have to pay for being trendy...........maybe that's why FJ 1100's and 1200's aren't considered trendy  :sarcastic: :sarcastic:     They need a cool sounding name !
Dean

'89 FJ 1200 3CV - owned from new.
'89 FJ 1200 3CV - no engine, tank, seat....parts bike for the future.
'88 FJ 1200 3CV - complete runner 2024 resto project
'88 FJ 1200 3CV - became a race bike, no longer with us.
'86 FJ 1200 1TX - sold to my boss to finance the '89 3CV I still own.

Waiex191

Quote from: Millietant on October 01, 2020, 12:49:13 AM
It's the price we have to pay for being trendy...........maybe that's why FJ 1100's and 1200's aren't considered trendy  :sarcastic: :sarcastic:     They need a cool sounding name !
Give it time Dean - it will be trendy again!
Bryan
1989 FJ1200
1981 Suzuki GN400
Poplar Grove, IL
 

Pat Conlon

Yep....The classic's *always* come back
1) Free Owners Manual download: https://tinyurl.com/fmsz7hk9
2) Don't store your FJ with E10 fuel https://tinyurl.com/3cjrfct5
3) Replace your old stock rubber brake lines.
4) Important items for the '84-87 FJ's:
Safety wire: https://tinyurl.com/99zp8ufh
Fuel line: https://tinyurl.com/bdff9bf3

FJ Flyer

Chris P.
'16 FJR1300ES
'87 FJ1200
'76 DT250

Wear your gear.


fj1289

Retro?

When I first got my FJ I would hear "I used to have one of those..."

Now I hear "I remember my Dad having one of those..."   

Harvy

Quote from: fj1289 on October 01, 2020, 10:54:58 PM
Retro?

When I first got my FJ I would hear "I used to have one of those..."

Now I hear "I remember my Dad having one of those..."   

And now my 30 year old son say "My dad still has one of those".

:biggrin:
FJZ1 1200 - It'll do me just fine.
Timing has much to do with the success of a rain dance.