News:

This forum is run by RPM and donations from members.

It is the donations of the members that help offset the operating cost of the forum. The secondary benefit of being a contributing member is the ability to save big during RPM Holiday sales. For more information please check out this link: Membership has its privileges 

Thank you for your support of the all mighty FJ.

Main Menu

3.5 inch front wheel

Started by Bones, December 27, 2013, 04:45:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bones

I know the benefits of having a 5.5inch x 17 rear wheel regarding tyre selection etc... But what benefit is there having a 3.5 inch front wheel over the standard 3inch x 17. You'd still only put a 120/70/17 tyre on it wouldn't you.:scratch_one-s_head:
                                                            Tony.
93 fj1200
79 suzuki gt250x7


Too young to be old but old enough to know better.

stua1959

Hi Tony.
I am pretty sure that 120 radial tyres were designed for 3.5" rims. Putting one on a 3" rim pulls the sidewalls in and gives u less useable tread. Looking at it from above the tread extends right down until it is almost vertical and not even Marquez could go there. On a 3.5" rim it would be a flatter profile and u would have more rubber on the road. When I did the trackday at Lakeside I still had huge chicken strips on the front so I am really only using half the tyre. My next tyre will be a 110 michelin radial which will suit the rim better

FJmonkey

The profile of a 120 on a 3.0 wheel is too pinched (reduced contact patch), a 120 should be on a 3.5 wheel. You should have a 110 on a 3.0 wheel. I cannot link the page but on the Avon site I chose a 110/70/17 and the recommended wheel width is 3.0/3.5. A 120/70/17 is 3.50/3.75. I think Dunlop has similar info posted.

Looks like stua posted first with some practical experience...
The glass is not half full, it was engineered with a 2X safety factor.

'86 Ambulance - Bent frame, cracked case, due for an overhaul
'89 Stormy Blue - Suits my Dark Side

~JM~

3.5" wheel?!?!?

Wouldn't that lower the front end excessively?  :lol:

~JM~

red

Just information:

On a 120/80-16 tire,
120 is the "correct" rim width needed, in millimeters (4.75" here).
80 is the "aspect ratio" (profile height, as a percentage), and
16 is the rim diameter in inches.

3.5" would be ~89mm.
3" would be ~76mm.

Cheers,
Red
Cheers,
Red

P.S. Life is too short, and health is too valuable, to ride on cheap parade-duty tires.

rktmanfj

Quote from: red on December 27, 2013, 12:01:45 PM
Just information:

On a 120/80-16 tire,
120 is the "correct" rim width needed, in millimeters (4.75" here).
80 is the "aspect ratio" (profile height, as a percentage), and
16 is the rim diameter in inches.

3.5" would be ~89mm.
3" would be ~76mm.

Cheers,
Red

:pardon:

More information: http://faq.ninja250.org/wiki/Tires_101:_An_Introduction  Pay particular attention to the last paragraph.

http://www.mechanical-shop.com/frontend/files/userfiles/files/ISO_norm_velgen.pdf


Randy T
Indy

Blessed be the LORD my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight.
Psalms 144:1

'89 FJ1200
'90 FJ1200
'78 XT500
'88 XT350