News:

         
Welcome to FJowners.com


It is the members who make this best place for FJ related content on the internet.

Main Menu

FJ 1200 Gear ratio

Started by Meraco, June 07, 2024, 09:54:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Meraco

Hello,

It is time for me to replace my chain and sprockets for the FJ. It currently has a 17/40 ratio. However I was thinking of reducing the top end RPM at highway speed.

I was curious if anyone has any experience or insight about my trying a 17/38 ratio.

Thanks


Pat Conlon

I recommend a 18/40 ratio. The larger chain wrap on the 18 tooth countershaft sprocket is beneficial to your chain.
1) Free Owners Manual download: https://tinyurl.com/fmsz7hk9
2) Don't store your FJ with E10 fuel https://tinyurl.com/3cjrfct5
3) Replace your old stock rubber brake lines.
4) Important items for the '84-87 FJ's:
Safety wire: https://tinyurl.com/99zp8ufh
Fuel line: https://tinyurl.com/bdff9bf3

FJmonkey

I agree with Pat, 18T is easier on the chain.
The glass is not half full, it was engineered with a 2X safety factor.

'86 Ambulance - Bent frame, cracked case, due for an overhaul
'89 Stormy Blue - Suits my Dark Side

Bones

Go 18/38. Relaxed long legged touring with still plenty of power for overtaking. 100kph @ 3500 rpm.
93 fj1200
79 suzuki gt250x7


Too young to be old but old enough to know better.

Millietant

I went with 18:40 for about 24,000 miles and loved it, but when I V replaced my chain and sprockets again, I decided to go a bit firmer and opted for 18:30. Now I've had that for a good few thousands of miles, I'd recommend that is the best option for your needs.

It's a bit e relaxed again at Highway speeds but still has more than of the overtaking power the FJ is legendary for  :good2:
Dean

'89 FJ 1200 3CV - owned from new.
'89 FJ 1200 3CV - no engine, tank, seat....parts bike for the future.
'88 FJ 1200 3CV - complete runner 2024 resto project
'88 FJ 1200 3CV - became a race bike, no longer with us.
'86 FJ 1200 1TX - sold to my boss to finance the '89 3CV I still own.

Meraco

Quote from: Bones on June 07, 2024, 03:44:28 PMGo 18/38. Relaxed long legged touring with still plenty of power for overtaking. 100kph @ 3500 rpm.

Since the consensus is to have the front end at 18, and I am already committed to the 38 at the back. It looks like Ill be trying your suggested configuration.

Currently I am getting 90 kph @ 3500 with the 17/40. I like the idea of bumping up to 100kph at the same RPM.





Millietant

Quote from: Millietant on June 08, 2024, 02:49:37 PMI went with 18:40 for about 24,000 miles and loved it, but when I V ("V" should not be there) replaced my chain and sprockets again, I decided to go a bit firmer (should read "further") and opted for 18:30 (should read 18:38). Now I've had that for a good few thousands of miles, I'd recommend that is the best option for your needs.

It's a bit e (should read "more") relaxed again at Highway speeds but still has more than ("enough" was missing here) of the overtaking power the FJ is legendary for  :good2:

I shouldn't type on my phone, without my glasses.....when I read my comments on my computer later, I realise how rubbish they are...and it's too late to correct them.
 :dash2:
Dean

'89 FJ 1200 3CV - owned from new.
'89 FJ 1200 3CV - no engine, tank, seat....parts bike for the future.
'88 FJ 1200 3CV - complete runner 2024 resto project
'88 FJ 1200 3CV - became a race bike, no longer with us.
'86 FJ 1200 1TX - sold to my boss to finance the '89 3CV I still own.

fj1289


Meraco

I now have the 18/38 installed. Took it for the first ride yesterday and the specs you guys gave was spot on.

Was doing 90/kmh @ 3,000 RPM.

And the lower gear torque doesn't seem all that affected. It's still punchy.

Now I need to clean the bike up.

Thanks everyone for the advice.

gumby302ho

I am running 18\39 because at the time RPM was out of the 38 tooth option, my 86 is showing
3100rpm at 100km\hr on the clocks.