News:

           Enjoy your FJ


Main Menu

Hello from California. Almost an FJ owner I think need help deciding.

Started by rockhammer, November 17, 2013, 06:57:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

airheadPete

I'm 6'3" and still have my first real bike, a '78 GS750, a great, great bike for it's time.
FJ all the way.
The Connie seems to be an excellent tool; but which one would you turn around and look at as you walked away?
(BTW, I have a Hepco-Becker top box on mine, dramatically increases any bike's utility.) :good:
'92 FJ1200.    '84 R100CS
'78 GS750E.   '81 R100RS
'76 R90/6       '89 R100GS
'65 R60/2

Pat Conlon

Quote from: airheadPete on November 18, 2013, 02:01:40 AM
......but which one would you turn around and look at as you walked away?

oooooh, that's good Pete....and very true.
1) Free Owners Manual download: https://tinyurl.com/fmsz7hk9
2) Don't store your FJ with E10 fuel https://tinyurl.com/3cjrfct5
3) Replace your old stock rubber brake lines.
4) Important items for the '84-87 FJ's:
Safety wire: https://tinyurl.com/99zp8ufh
Fuel line: https://tinyurl.com/bdff9bf3

rockhammer

Thanks FJ members for all your input.  I have decided on the fj and will be picking her up this weekend.  Once I do I will update my profile.  Oh btw Cap'n I am out of Corona Ca.

Best


FJmonkey

Sounds like it is time for a run to Palomar to meet and ride with our new member.
The glass is not half full, it was engineered with a 2X safety factor.

'86 Ambulance - Bent frame, cracked case, due for an overhaul
'89 Stormy Blue - Suits my Dark Side

Capn Ron

Quote from: FJmonkey on November 18, 2013, 02:17:28 PM
Sounds like it is time for a run to Palomar to meet and ride with our new member.

Yeah...that sounds about right!   :good2:

Cap'n Ron. . .
Cap'n Ron. . .


There are two types of people in the world...Those who put people into categories...and those who don't.

rockhammer

Hello

So one last question.  Any one have any thoughts on the st1100?  Just curious because this would be the only other bike I would possibly consider.


Country Joe

Quote from: FJmonkey on November 18, 2013, 02:17:28 PM
Sounds like it is time for a run to Palomar to meet and ride with our new member.

At least try not to scare him off like the last one....... :rofl:

    Joe
1993 FJ 1200

Pat Conlon

Same comments as the Connie.
The ST is a big heavy bike, slower than the FJ, but with the V4 much smoother than both the FJ and Connie.
For long distance tours the ST is hands down better, for canyon carving duties much worse than the FJ.

The only bike I would consider replacing my versatile FJ with would need:
1) a big gas tank, 6.5 gallons minimum
2) fuel injection
3) water cooled
4) six speed tranny
5) it must weigh less than our 550 lb bikes, around 450 lbs wet would be great
6) it must have at least 85-95 ft/lbs of torque, 140-160rwhp.
7) fully adjustable suspension, high/low compression/rebound. ESA would be cool.


Oh yea,

8 ) it must not look like a dog turd. IMHO, the FJ is one of the most beautiful bikes made.
1) Free Owners Manual download: https://tinyurl.com/fmsz7hk9
2) Don't store your FJ with E10 fuel https://tinyurl.com/3cjrfct5
3) Replace your old stock rubber brake lines.
4) Important items for the '84-87 FJ's:
Safety wire: https://tinyurl.com/99zp8ufh
Fuel line: https://tinyurl.com/bdff9bf3

Flynt

Quote from: rockhammer on November 18, 2013, 05:39:56 PM
Any one have any thoughts on the st1100? 

I rented a 2009ish ST1300 in Nashville and rode it for a full 300mi kind of day.  Very competent, but very BLAH....  pretty far from sporty, soft and squishy suspension, decent luggage and comfort level.  I think for pure touring it might be a little better than an FJ, but not a good commuter, lane splitter, run around kind of bike...  too ponderous for that.  Not sure how it compares to an 1100?

I think your initial description sounds more FJ to me.  I commute one day, blast the redwoods the next, then load the top box and wife onboard and head for Big Sur.  Awesome bikes!

Frank
There's plenty of time for sleep in the grave...

Flynt

Quote from: Pat Conlon on November 18, 2013, 06:10:56 PM
The only bike I would consider replacing my versatile FJ with would need:
1) a big gas tank, 6.5 gallons minimum
2) fuel injection
3) water cooled
4) six speed tranny
5) it must weigh less than our 550 lb bikes, around 450 lbs wet would be great
6) it must have at least 85-95 ft/lbs of torque, 140-160rwhp.
7) fully adjustable suspension, high/low compression/rebound. ESA would be cool.
8 ) it must not look like a dog turd. IMHO, the FJ is one of the most beautiful bikes made.

You are a Hypermotard man...  My '08 1100 Ducati Hyper graded on your criteria:

1. 6.4 gal, 250+ mile range
2. check...  really excellent fueling overall
3. nope...  another air-cooled bike, but they're simple and this one has integrated temp gauge and warning (never seen it)
4. check
5. 380lb wet
6. check on torque...  you won't care about Hp
7. check, USD front, Ohlins rear
8. you be the judge:



Makes a great compliment to the FJ.

Frank
There's plenty of time for sleep in the grave...

Dads_FJ

Quote from: Flynt on November 18, 2013, 06:38:00 PM
Quote from: Pat Conlon on November 18, 2013, 06:10:56 PM
The only bike I would consider replacing my versatile FJ with would need:
1) a big gas tank, 6.5 gallons minimum
2) fuel injection
3) water cooled
4) six speed tranny
5) it must weigh less than our 550 lb bikes, around 450 lbs wet would be great
6) it must have at least 85-95 ft/lbs of torque, 140-160rwhp.
7) fully adjustable suspension, high/low compression/rebound. ESA would be cool.
8 ) it must not look like a dog turd. IMHO, the FJ is one of the most beautiful bikes made.

You are a Hypermotard man...  My '08 1100 Ducati Hyper graded on your criteria:

1. 6.4 gal, 250+ mile range
2. check...  really excellent fueling overall
3. nope...  another air-cooled bike, but they're simple and this one has integrated temp gauge and warning (never seen it)
4. check
5. 380lb wet
6. check on torque...  you won't care about Hp
7. check, USD front, Ohlins rear
8. you be the judge:



Makes a great compliment to the FJ.

Frank

Does the dry clutch make a mess with dust?  If so you know that won't do with Pat.
John S.

'84 Yamaha FJ1100
'89 Yamaha FJ1200
'94 Yamaha WR250
'80 BMW R100S/Sidecar
'39 BSA WM20

Flynt

not much dust from clutch...  Pat need's more to polish anyway.

Frank
There's plenty of time for sleep in the grave...

fintip

For me it's the awful noise of a dry clutch... They sell kits to convert them to wet clutch, though, from what I understand.

I used to think so highly of ducatti, as if it were some unobtainable far and away performance brand. A friend bought a monster. I test rode it for him. Total disappointment for me. Such a boring ride. So much torque, so little usable unless you were pulling a trailer. Just felt cumbersome. And rough.  Ugh. I'm sure their performance crotch rockets must be different, but... I was not impressed.

And that GOD AWFUL DRY CLUTCH NOISE?!?! How do people DEAL with that???
fjowners.wikidot.com

Not everyone understands what a completely rational process this maintenance of a motorcycle is. They think it's some kind of a knack or some kind of affinity for machines in operation. They are right, but the knack is almost purely a process of reason.
-ZAMM

IBA:54952

Dan Filetti

Quote from: Pat Conlon on November 18, 2013, 06:10:56 PM
Same comments as the Connie.
The ST is a big heavy bike, slower than the FJ, but with the V4 much smoother than both the FJ and Connie.
For long distance tours the ST is hands down better, for canyon carving duties much worse than the FJ.

The only bike I would consider replacing my versatile FJ with would need:
1) a big gas tank, 6.5 gallons minimum
2) fuel injection
3) water cooled
4) six speed tranny
5) it must weigh less than our 550 lb bikes, around 450 lbs wet would be great
6) it must have at least 85-95 ft/lbs of torque, 140-160rwhp.
7) fully adjustable suspension, high/low compression/rebound. ESA would be cool.


Oh yea,

8 ) it must not look like a dog turd. IMHO, the FJ is one of the most beautiful bikes made.


Pat

The BMW K1300S ticks many of your boxes: 503lbs (dry) 560lbs (wet), FI, water cooled, Six speed tranny, 175HP, 103 ft/lbs, the tank is only 5 gallons though, with a 1 gallon reserve, adjustable everything on the suspension (on the fly) but the single-sided swing arm, traction control, and quick shifter are cool too.   It does have shaft drive, which you did not order, and it sure as hell is not cheap ($18K).

You really should give one a test ride at some point, a fine machine for sure.  I only rode one for a couple of miles, not nearly enough, but it felt like a modern, more refined, stronger, black bird.  

Doesn't look like a turd either:



Dan
Live hardy, or go home. 

Mike Ramos

Good evening,

"Blast the Redwoods..."

"Blast" is the operative word when riding with Mr. B...!

I believe "epic" as in a memorable ride was also used.

Ride safe.