News:

This forum is run by RPM and donations from members.

It is the donations of the members that help offset the operating cost of the forum. The secondary benefit of being a contributing member is the ability to save big during RPM Holiday sales. For more information please check out this link: Membership has its privileges 

Thank you for your support of the all mighty FJ.

Main Menu

Helmet law protest

Started by Travis398, July 04, 2011, 08:07:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3
User actions

billwest

#30
July 07, 2011, 06:23:27 AM
Quote from: DailyDriver on July 06, 2011, 10:59:59 AM
But why stop there?  Should a motorcyclist be required to wear certified full body protective gear at all times? The argument is the same IMO. ATGATT should be required in order to be consistent with the helmet argument. After all, a head injury is not the only thing that can rack up high medical costs(skin graphs, spinal cord injury, loss of limb) or cause  a lifetime of misery for the victim and their families and since motorcycles are inherently dangerous.... Those who are ATGATT, more power to you

My mate was actually lamenting the fact that he didn't wear protective pants, like Draggin Jeans, or even leather.  His choice, btw.
Perhaps we will soon see MotoGP racers going around in shorts and T-shirts, because of freedom of choice?  Or are they smarter than that?

Another 2c.
Sold it!
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3
User actions