News:

This forum is run by RPM and donations from members.

It is the donations of the members that help offset the operating cost of the forum. The secondary benefit of being a contributing member is the ability to save big during RPM Holiday sales. For more information please check out this link: Membership has its privileges 

Thank you for your support of the all mighty FJ.

Main Menu

Bloody governments

Started by baldy3853, December 06, 2012, 12:10:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

baldy3853

bloody governments

Hi folks just saw this, I know its only Victoria but can we all sign it even our Victorian riders, another fine example of "its the riders fault we can't see you" if the drivers opened their F###ing eyes, stopped using their mobiles and every other distraction maybe it wouldn't be so bad!!

http://www.change.org/petitions/the-hon ... m=27898683



baldy3853

This is the report that was handed down on this after 18months

Hi Everyone,
this news is excellent though it is important that we assist with keeping the pressure on with this petition supporting all the other bodies pushing for a positive result for two wheeled safety........

Just one of 64 suggestions in the 535-page Victorian report, which is also notable for not supporting hi-vis vests or front numberplates

The 18-month Victorian parliamentary inquiry onto motorcycle safety has finally delivered its report, with the Australian Motorcycle Council lauding the document as one which "will be a reference point across Australia in the coming years". And the report is also notable for what's not in it: there's no support for hi-vis vests or front numberplates.

The 535-page report makes 64 suggestions, including:
That the motorcycle safety levy be abolished;
That an independent office of road safety data be created, which will be responsible for collecting, collating, interpreting, and publishing all data relevant to road safety, including motorcycle safety;
That an immediate program to improve inter-agency data cooperation and collaboration on motorcycle crash data be instituted by government agencies;
That VicRoads and the Transport Accident Commission treat off-road motorcycle safety no differently to that of on-road motorcycles;
That VicRoads includes motorcycle specific questions in its licence testing regime and motorcycle safety content in its training syllabus for learner and probationary car licence students;
That the Transport Accident Commission focuses its motorcycle safety advertising on redressing the attitude that responsibility for rider safety is solely attributable to the rider;
That a star rating system for protective clothing, which includes boots, gloves, jackets, pants and armour, be established... and be fully functioning within 36 months of the tabling of this report;
That VicRoads and the Transport Accident Commission investigate ways of improving motorcycle safety through behavioural change programs including changes to the car licence curriculum and road rules so that motorcyclists and the risks posed to them by other road users are highlighted; and
That the benefits and risks of filtering, as distinct for lane splitting, be reviewed with the aim of introducing filtering in Victoria.
"The 18-month inquiry had produced a report that will be a reference point across Australia in the coming years," said Shaun Lennard, the chairman of the Australian Motorcycle Council.

"I try to avoid clichés, but this report is a game-changer -- not only for Victoria, Australia, and even extending across the OECD and developing countries.

"It has confirmed - but now in an official government report -- a number of the things we have known for many years. The lack of accurate data around motorcycle crashes was recognised at the 2008 Canberra Motorcycle and Scooter Safety Summit -- as is stated in the report. That's four and a half years ago, with little progress.

"The AMC has also been calling for MAIDS -- Motorcycle Accident In-depth Study --- research in Australia, and that's in the report too."

Lennard believes one of the most significant recommendations is the abolition of the safety levy, which is an annual charge payable by all motorcyclists.

"We've always held the view that it's unfair to make motorcycle riders pay for road safety improvements, when for all other road users it's provided from general revenue.

"Two things that have had more publicity than they deserved in the past six months do not feature in the report. There's no plan for front numberplates and no plan for high-vis clothing. Let's stop talking about these things now -- they're simply not on the agenda."

The Victorian Government is required to table a response to the report within six months.

Regards Angus Constable-Townsend