News:

           Enjoy your FJ


Main Menu

Why did they change the swingarm?

Started by JPaganel, July 23, 2013, 11:17:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

JPaganel

Does anyone know what the rationale was behind changing the aluminum swingarm of the early FJ to the steel one on the late ones? Kinda seems like a step backwards.
1993 FJ1200 ABS

1984 FJ600, up on blocks

1986 FJ1200, flaming wreck, repaired and sold
1986 FJ1200, repaired, ridden, sold


I don't want a pickle
I just want to ride my motorcicle

ken65

i read an article recently that suggests bikes built upto 1990 where built to specs then afterwards to a budget, this is most likely going to be controversal but its just what i read , what year did they change too a steel swinger?

Harvy

FJZ1 1200 - It'll do me just fine.
Timing has much to do with the success of a rain dance.

movenon

My 1990 has AL swing arm. 91 up changed to steel. Mine seems to slow down every time I ride by a polishing wheel..... :dash2: :dash2: :rofl2:
George
Life isn't about having the best, but about making the best of what you have...

1990 FJ 1200

ken65


ribbert

Quote from: JPaganel on July 23, 2013, 11:17:52 PM
Does anyone know what the rationale was behind changing the aluminum swingarm of the early FJ to the steel one on the late ones? Kinda seems like a step backwards.

Once the speed of the aerodynamically superior 3XW was realised, along with it's better brakes, wheels, suspension etc, it became obvious the recycled lolly wrapper swing arms on the earlier models wouldn't cut it.
It needed a man's swing arm.
"Tell a wise man something he doesn't know and he'll thank you, tell a fool something he doesn't know and he'll abuse you"

fintip

:rofl2:

I also understand that weight savings stopped being a consideration on the later models, and so the cheaper option became preferable.

What interests me, though, is that they went to the trouble to actually design a new one and cast a new mold. Seems like a lot of effort. I suppose the savings on materials justified it, or some engineer had to get his quota of work in, was bored with not enough changing on the bike and not finding any real way to improve it, ha.  :pardon:
fjowners.wikidot.com

Not everyone understands what a completely rational process this maintenance of a motorcycle is. They think it's some kind of a knack or some kind of affinity for machines in operation. They are right, but the knack is almost purely a process of reason.
-ZAMM

IBA:54952

ken65

noel says    " Once the speed of the aerodynamically superior 3XW was realised, along with it's better brakes, wheels, suspension etc, it became obvious the recycled lolly wrapper swing arms on the earlier models wouldn't cut it. "


hehe  , thats why it appears everybody except me is fitting aftermarket brakes, wheels, suspension etc especially on the 3XW,  only joking cause i have a 3CV, the 1990 version, ,  built to specs not a budget.. and it appears its not the proto type either, i must of lucked out getting the best model  1st up, at the time i didnt realise that.   ken

fintip

Whatever. Doc recommended that if I don't get the '84/'85, the only other possible option was the '86/'87. No interest in an 'upgrade' for me, I still only pine for an '84 actually. (Want to keep my current one though! One for a DR, one as a showpiece restoration!)
fjowners.wikidot.com

Not everyone understands what a completely rational process this maintenance of a motorcycle is. They think it's some kind of a knack or some kind of affinity for machines in operation. They are right, but the knack is almost purely a process of reason.
-ZAMM

IBA:54952

JCainFJ

One of the reasons they changed the swingarm was to accommodate the ABS pump. If you look the shock on the 91+ FJ's is offset to one side because they needed the space for the pump. Steel is cheaper to fab. too.